Though Cambodia has been free for years, this was shocking due to the violent nature of the removal.
RSS Cambodia BBC News had a surprising article about the eviction of Dey Krahorm in Phnom Penh. The Traveling musicians, cultural arts and dancers that lived in the the slum area of the city were removed. This removal was not without force, and was done before land compensation was firm. Most artistic events happen within the city, so the forceable removal took the artist from their work. How long will Arts, and culture suffer while it peacefully waits.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
To me that is proof that freedom is a very relative term. It seems to me that the Chinese are okay with becoming capitalistic in economic terms and as long as it yields profit, there are no objections. But, as clearly stated in this article, cultural freedom is still not tolerated. It's almost as if the government fears giving the people too much freedom. In my eyes, it seems rather backwards. I would prefer to have cultural freedoms over profit but then again I haven't lived as a peasant for the past twenty or thirty years either.
ReplyDeleteYou know once I got to thinking about what I wrote I came to the realization that if it was up to the people of China, not the government, the choice might be tough for some people to pick between personal freedoms or money... which do you think they would choose? I mean if you have lived as a peasant almost starving but been ignorant to some facets of life, then you came to the knowledge that you could live better not just according to economic standards... how would you choose?
ReplyDelete向量张量纯量喜欢加乘不喜欢减除
ReplyDelete功能原理.移項法則->W(力場作正功)=deltaEk(動能之增加)=-ΔU(位能之減少)
機械能守衡.加減法原理->deltaEk+deltaUs.deltaUg=0彈.重力場
悉怛多缽怛囉阿門